Do Political Campaign Contributions Impact the Outcome of Elections? :: essays research papers

Do Political Campaign Contributions Impact the Outcome of Elections? In the emergence of searching for a query question that has the possibility of gaining arbitrary results 1 must find a dependent variable in increment to several(prenominal) item-by-item variables that might be a luff guinea pig or a factor in the dependent variable. In observe major political elections throughout my life I take on detect a recurring trend. In many elections one prognosis outspends their antagonist in an attempt to gain victory. I intend to mend up a query design to determine whether independent variables concerning lead contributions pee-pee an effect on the yield of elections.      As effort pay clear remains a hot topic in intercourse with principle such as the McCain-Feinghold Bill, it is important to determine if campaign pass affects the outcome of elections. If the results this question charge a direct relationship surrounded by the independent var iables and the dependent variable and so legislative restrictions might necessary. If campaign outlay does not factor in on the outcome of elections, then maybe thither is nothing wrong with a candidate outspending their opponent.       most(prenominal) articles and books collect been written on this subject that I bemuse set useful. consort to Ruth S. Jones(1981) These sentiments are often supplemented by a opinion that the hardly way a minority party can march on is by outspending opponents. Throughout the article Jones focuses in on this trend. If this assumption is dead on target it would indicate that outspending an incumbent is necessary to gain office.     The Committee for Economic increment base similar results(1968), Candidates with access to vast personal or family fortunes have a substantial advantage in the pursuit of high office. This means that a wealthy candidate can in essence barter for a victory in an electio n. This committees research has provided several facts toward my research plan.      On the contrary, in an article by Gary C. Jacobsen(1978),spending by challengers has a substantial impact on election outcomes, whereas spending by incumbents has comparatively little effect. These findings add another Wrinkle in the extremity of material body my research design by forcing me to differentiate if spending by incumbents and challengers has a different impact. This article refers to a number of recent studies that build that there is a relationship between how much money is played out and how sanitary a candidate does on election day.      Throughout the ordinal blow events have occurred that indicate that campaign spending in some instances factored in on the results of elections.Do Political Campaign Contributions Impact the Outcome of Elections? essays research papersDo Political Campaign Contributions Impact the Outcome of Elections? In the process of searching for a research question that has the possibility of gaining positive results one must find a dependent variable in addition to several independent variables that might be a direct cause or a factor in the dependent variable. In observing major political elections throughout my life I have noticed a recurring trend. In many elections one candidate outspends their opponent in an attempt to gain victory. I intend to set up a research design to determine whether independent variables concerning campaign contributions have an effect on the outcome of elections.      As campaign finance reform remains a hot topic in congress with legislation such as the McCain-Feinghold Bill, it is important to determine if campaign spending affects the outcome of elections. If the results this question indicate a direct relationship between the independent variables and the dependent variable then legislative restrictions might necessary. If campaign spend ing does not factor in on the outcome of elections, then maybe there is nothing wrong with a candidate outspending their opponent.      Several articles and books have been written on this subject that I have found useful. According to Ruth S. Jones(1981) These sentiments are often supplemented by a belief that the only way a minority party can win is by outspending opponents. Throughout the article Jones focuses in on this trend. If this assumption is true it would indicate that outspending an incumbent is necessary to gain office.     The Committee for Economic Development found similar results(1968), Candidates with access to vast personal or family fortunes have a substantial advantage in the pursuit of high office. This means that a wealthy candidate can in essence buy a victory in an election. This committees research has provided several facts toward my research plan.      On the contrary, in an article by Gary C. Ja cobsen(1978),spending by challengers has a substantial impact on election outcomes, whereas spending by incumbents has relatively little effect. These findings add another Wrinkle in the process of framing my research design by forcing me to differentiate if spending by incumbents and challengers has a different impact. This article refers to a number of recent studies that found that there is a relationship between how much money is spent and how well a candidate does on election day.      Throughout the twentieth century events have occurred that indicate that campaign spending in some instances factored in on the results of elections.