What Should Be Allowed?

Its a thin edge. What should be allowed and what shouldnt? I envisage violence shouldnt be allowed for children less than decennium to twelve years. Whether its shown in a video high or in a heavily violent movie. Of course, it depends on the character of the violence. A standard Pirates of the Caribbean movie, which is also meant to be funny, should be faster allowed than a standard James Bond or Die hard movie ,which is particularly meant for creating tension. Children shouldnt pass people annoy killed, on a cruel way. I even think that it sometimes empennage lead to traumatic experiences. In my opinion, watching all that cruelty, at such a young age, can have very detrimental consequences. It whitethorn even lead to a kind of fear in a later stage of life. Although, I also think that, from the age of twelve years, you develop an early adulthood. You are adapted to make a decision whether it should be allowed or not. You can make the decision yourself, trusting on an early adulthood.



I really think it makes no sense to put a restriction (16+ or 18+) on video games or movies based on violence. There are children who are absolutely able to watch James Bond movies on their twelfth age and there are children who wouldnt be pitch on their 14th age. It all depends from child to child. For sexual utterances its fairly the same. Of course, there will be some movies, who earlier shouldnt be shown to twelve year olds, but thats on your own responsibility. It again depends from child to child.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper