A summarizing critique of: Organizational Predictors of Women on Corporate Boards.By Hillman. A. J., Shropshire. C. , Cannella Jr. A. A. (2007) In: Academy of Management Journal, 50: 941 - 952.

This article was an exploratory one it tried and true to identify characteristics and the conditions that makes a firms board much likely to accommodate female person directors and answering the question: why do many firms have women on their boards but others dont? (p.941)

The authors tried to identify the benefits directors trick bring for the boards establish on resource dependence theory (Pfeffer & Salanick, 1978). Because it studies directors careless(predicate) of the grammatical gender, they combined it with Work-group-level diversity theories to identify potential benefits of female bureau on boards of directors(p.942).

Hillman rivet on organizational characteristics and earlier related researches foundations such as Dalton et la Assumption: firms that deal better with environmental uncertainly perform better (1999), in addition to Pfeffer and Salanick proposal: organizations can have three benefits from board linkages which are: advice and counsel, legitimacy, and channels for communication (1978:145, 161), taking in consideration Amason argument that the benefit of gender diversity can improve brainstorming, creativity, consideration of diverse perspectives more than the possible negative implication for communication (1996).

Firms deliver benefits from having women on their boards; Peterson (2007:179) claims since the appearance of the B&P study, there has been increasing published evidence, twain anecdotal and empirical, of the benefits of having female directors on boards.

Authors outlined four hypotheses summarized: the female representation on boards of directors positively associated with organization size, female employees numbers, and links to other firms with female directors, and the firms level of diversification. They used purposive sampling by selecting the spinning top 1000 public traded U.S firms that had the largest sales, and filtering it to 950 firms the sample is large but not representative, the small and medium size firms were not represented in the sample, which led to a weak generalisation for their results.

The researcher adopted the deductivism...

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper