Clytaemnestra, although villified in the Oresteia, was in fact a moral cartridge remover of vendetta rightness who fell victim to the patriarchal Athenian society. What constitutes legal expert is a question that could not be devoted evaluator in one brief composing; therefore, for purposes of this paper we will use only deuce ideas of justice: vendetta justice and legal justice. Vendetta justice defies boundaries limiting actions and allows the cartridge cartridge extractor to make their own definition. This would encompass such theory as An eye for an eye adn a tooth for a tooth. Meanwhile, legal justice is regulated by a governing body who makes the finish as to whether there has been an offense requiring justice, and what consititutes fair and equitable justice. The Oresteia offers two different types of justice, vendetta, as well as trial justice; however, at the time that Clytaemnestra committed the act of murder, legal justice was not being offered to her. It is for this reason that this papers seeks to prove that Clytaemnestra is an extractor of vendetta justice, which is the only justice which she had available to her. An examination of the theatrical role of Clytaemnestra by analyzing the dialogue of Agamemnon shows that the actions of Clytaemnestra were not only justified for teh zeitgeist of the Mycenae age, nevertheless were also admirable given a womans position in society.
This strength of character is an important and undervalued commodity in a play which offered a strong, determined woman the spotlight to fine-tune as intelligent and capable. Were Clytaemnestras actions villainous? Certainly one superpower argue that this is true in todays culture; however, it does not unavoidably follow that the actions of Clytaemnestra were either vile or wicked in the eyes of the Athenian culture. The Furies argue that a violation of the line of descent tie was more...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment