Eyewitness testimony has been used frequently oer time in various situations. It sometimes holds more be then some facts or evidence. Yet it is also the dry land why many innocent people go to put away and criminals still walk free. Eyewitness testimony has been used for over 100 years. It has played a major part in convicting criminals, from the common thief to the most dangerous murderer. However, with the time in the midst of incident and testimony or even report can buoy vary drastically, the quality of witness testimony wasnt really recognize as an issue until the 1970s. With plenty of unsolved crimes and not sufficiency evidence eyewitness testimony was all that was needed. Now with psychologists prop scientific studies to see if it is reliable; the legal jurisdictions try to abide more attention to the specific details. Through many studies it has been shown how the trueness of the reports given can be altered by the ethnicity of the soulfulness and their current emotional state. It is believed that if a weapon is used in the crime that is witnessed then the eyewitness might become deflect by the event, impairing their judgment (Wagstaff, Macveigh, Boston, Scott, Brunas-Wagstaff, &Cole 2003). This research set about will answer questions about how often faulty eyewitness testimony occurs, how it happens, and finally I will discuss how we as a society can attempt to fix it.
October 2002, ten people were killed and trey injured when two snipers went on a killing offer in the Washington, D.C. area. Soon after the first shootings, police denote they were flavour for a white male in his twenties, driveway a white Van. Loftus gives the example of the sniper attacks in the fall of 2002.Everybody was looking for a white van even though the perpetrators, in actuality, had been driving a dark...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment