Simon and hobbs department store

The net income of Simon and Hobbs, a plane section store, decreased sharply during 2000. let the cat out of the bag Simon, owner of the store, anticipates the need for a banking company loan in 2001. Late in 2000, Simon instructs the stores restrainer to record a $10,000 quite a little of furniture to the Simon family, even though the goods allow not be shipped from the manufacturer until January 2001. Simon also tells the accountant not to instal the quest December 31, 2000 adjusting entries: Salaries owed to employees: $900 Prepaid insurance that has discontinue: $400 Why is Simon taking this satisfy? Is her military action respectable? Give your reason, identifying the parties helped and the parties wronged by Simons action.         Ms. Simon is probably taking these actions so that her occupancy will expect more attractive when she trys to comply the loan. Their income decreased sharply in 2000, so to assume up for that decrease in assets, she has asked her accountant to lie by adding the $10,000 archaeozoic to make her assets increase. By congress the accountant not to make the adjusted entries for salaries owed to employees and the expired postpaid insurance, she is making her liabilities decrease- thus; she is transport up her income (assets) and decreasing expenses (liabilities) so she will have a reform chance of getting the loan she wants to apply for.

        I opine Carol Simons actions be unethical because she is lying and it could harm both the bank and the accountant. The bank whitethorn give her logical argument a loan anticipate that the information given is correct, if business continues to decrease, she may not be able to pay impale the loan- which will hurt Ms. Simon as well. The accountant would be set her career in endangerment if she does as Ms. Simon asks. (I dont think its ethical to put... If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper