In the Authors look that accompanied the second British edition of core of Darkness in book form (1902), Conrad responds to the literary possibility (9) that swirled around his surrogate narrator Marlow by describing their relationship as if it were an actual friendship rather than an effect of artistic creation. When Conrad hints at one point that with the disappearance of his creator, Marlows occupation would be deceased and he would suffer from that extinguishing (10), it is possible to take this as a bad joke, if one that anticipates later modern faultfinding developments such as the emergence of the concept of the death of the author.( n1) just now what are we to make of the fact that Conrads somewhat glib allusion to his proxys say-so unemployment occurs in the preface to a novella so fundamentally--and darkly--preoccupied with the themes of expire, the extinction of work, and death? After all, near the beginning of his journey upriver, Marlow result encounter a set of figures who tread the line between work and extinction, but this time in a place much less whimsical than that framed in the Authors Note:They were dying slowly--it was very clear. They were not enemies, they were not criminals, they were nothing sublunary now,--nothing but black shadows of disease and starvation, lying confusedly in the greenish gloom.
Brought from all the recesses of the coast in all the rightfulness of time contracts, lost in uncongenial surroundings, fed on unfamiliar food, they sickened, became inefficient, and were then allowed to crawl away and rest. (35)Worked until they can work no more, until they became inefficient, these native laborers have been abandoned to an extinction uttermost more dire than the one predicted by Conrad for his character. Nevertheless, however distinct the tonal bearings of the two passages, in conjunction...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment